Since public domain doesnt add restrictions, the combination is good as long as you obey the gpl terms and the public domain terms. Gnu general public license version 2 open source initiative. While much of what we will cover may be known to some readers, we believe that there is. Licenses are usually only compatible if at least one is a very permissive license, and you are essentially only bound by the other license. For a list of licenses not specifically intended for software, see list of free content licenses. What is open source software vs proprietary softwareclosed source software gpl license. Licenses for your open source project mit vs gpl vs apache. I also show how you can sell open source software by selling license exceptions. The long and short of itif you use open source software within your software development project, any permissive license should be fine. The one most widely used is the general public license gpl, which we cover in this article.
Jan 21, 20 the free source crowd looked to the gnu general public license as the ideal license to enforce user freedom, because it forced ironclad guarantees that the code in question would remain open source, while the open source group focused on a broader definition of freedom, preferring the more liberal apache license. The gnu general public license is a free software license, created by the free software foundationfsf. There are several unofficial modules floating around, meaning the technical obstacles arent insurmountable. Lgpl allows you to use and distribute the open source software with your application without releasing the source code for your application. There was some discussion about this data back when it was released in 2011. This module will cover these and other legal issues that arise from the interplay between open source software and patents. Commercial licenses on the other hand talk about the use of the software. Once the tlo has approved release of the software via an open source license, you may then post or distribute your software under such open source license. To understand the difference between gpl and lgpl you have to understand the basic idea of open source software. The osi recommends a mix of permissive and copyleft licenses, the apache license 2.
This license was originally written by richard stallman from the free software foundation for the gnu project. Does the python software foundation license permit. Infecting means derived program violate gpl, infected means gpl program violate its own license. May 11, 2017 the gnu gpl requires that when you use gpllicensed software to make some other software, the resulting software also has to be opensourced with the same license if its released to the public. The gpl governs the distribution of the software, not its use. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula youtube. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. Nov 08, 2015 linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. Both copyleft and permissive licenses allow developers to copy, modify, and redistribute code derivative or otherwise freely. However, it is a copyleft license, as opposed to the permissive bsd, mit, and apache licenses. The tlo will discuss open source licensing strategies with the authors. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project free. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. It first came into being in the month of september of 1983.
Gnu general public license, version 2 spdx short identifier. The gnu gpl requires that when you use gpllicensed software to make some other software, the resulting software also has to be opensourced with. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses. The gpl general public license is another popular open source license. It allows users to study, run, share, and modify the software. Copyleft or free software licensing helps ensure open standards and the continuity of the code.
This is a free software license but is incompatible with the gnu gpl. The gpl was intended to keep software from becoming proprietary. Licence zabbix the enterpriseclass open source network. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may. Difference between gpl and lgpl difference between. A gpl functions as a license, and when a software author releases their product using a gpl, they are licensing whomever receives the software to use it as they. The php license is a bsdstyle license which does not have the copyleft restrictions associated with gpl. This is a comparison of free and opensource software licenses. We will also summarize the terms of use of the most. Jun 12, 2007 the gpl is no more viral than any commercial license, the only difference is in how you pay to use the software. The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. Historically, the gpl license family has been one of the most popular software licenses in the free and opensource. The gnu general public licence, or gpl as its often called, is the most popular free software licence and its used by many different projects, including the linux kernel, the gnu tools and literally hundreds of others.
Gpl general public license is a free license software that is popularly used across the world. Why corporations favors the apache license over the gpllgpl. Berkeley software distributionstyle licenses have been used to govern the development of. Since you have access to the codes through open source software, you are permitted to make changes, improve it, and create your own twist. This license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may wish to relicense your software under gpl version 3. However, the language of the license text was strongly amended and is much more comprehensive in response to technical and legal changes and. For example, there is a lot of pressure on linux gplv2 to include suns now oracles zfs filesystem cddl license, from solaris, as it is a more mature, tested alternative to the seemingly forever trapped in development linux native btrfs. David chisnall compares the two most popular software licenses in the free and open source software foss communities. The gpl license imposes similar obligations as the bsdlike licenses, but one major difference persists. A federal court has ruled that an opensource license is.
Gpl program is infecting and infected the parent and the child non gpl process proprietary and even other open source license from the perspective of law. A proper license ensures that people do not steal your works. If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. When versata software sued ameriprise financial services for breaching its software license, it unwittingly unearthed a gpl violation of its own and touched off another lawsuit that could prove to be a leading case on free and open source software licensing. Licensing of ones works is a huge issue in the world of open source software. I also show how you can sell open source software by. The gpl license is viral, meaning any derivative work you create containing even the smallest portion of the previously gpl licensed software must also be licensed under the gpl license. This is a comparison of free and open source software licenses. We, the free software foundation, use the gnu general public license for most of our software. This is especially a concern for libraries which are building blocks for larger software. The apache license, on the other hand, is favored by the big corporations for their open source projects.
For a list of licenses not specifically i ntended fo r software, see list of free cont ent licenses. Recent versions of the open software license have a term which requires distributors to try to obtain explicit assent to the license. Licenses for your open source project mit vs gpl vs. Difference between different types of open sources licenses. This essay argues that developers of freelibre open source software floss, aka ossfs should use an existing widelyused license compatible with the general public license gpl, particularly the gpl, lgpl, mitx, or bsdnew licenses. Understanding opensource and free software licensing medium.
While open sourcing a project, one needs a license so that the terms distribution, linking, modification, private use, etc. Why you should use a bsd style license for your open. Gpl is basically the legal terminology that makes open source software what it is. However, the gnu general public license or gpl predates the open source movement by many years by the founder of a movement with different goals than the open source movement. And its always worth remembering that you dont have to share until you distribute the sourcecode and as corporations are legal entities, you can give a copy to all your odd coworkers without legally distributing it. However, the language of the license text was strongly amended and is much more comprehensive in response to technical and legal changes and international license exchange.
Also, it is a common misconception that open source software cannot be patented. Gpl offers a wide range of potential improvements for the entire programming community. These projects will hopefully be licensed if you havent got a license on your open source project, youre doing it wrong, to ensure that your contributions. Software and open source licensing mit technology licensing. Gpl and lgpl open source licensing restrictions stack. Lgpl is used for software libraries, versus the execution files of gpl. Jun 21, 2016 most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. The gpl builds on the traditional open source license by requiring the release of source code of any piece of software that is built on another piece of open source software. Raymonds argument seems to be that if openness is the winning strategy, an argument michael tiemann advocates, wouldnt it make sense to use the most. This general public license does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. Aug 07, 2018 open source dual licensing two licenses for one product. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3. The gpl was a trailblazer at the start of the open source revolution and is a prime example of the copyleft or viral license. One of the most interesting features of mysql is the license.
Which license to use a great many developers, myself included, believe that it is important to spend at least some time contributing to open source software projects. Gnu general public license this license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. The gpl is used by wellknown platforms and software technology such as linux, gnome, kde, and mysql. This is a comparison of free and open sourc e software licen ses. The comparison only covers software licenses with a linked article for details, approved by at least one expert group at the fsf, the osi, the debian project or the fedora project.
Liste des licences avec commentaires projet gnu free software. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software into gplv3 works. The gpl is very restrictive in the sense it forces any derivative work to be released open source under the same terms. Right now there are two licenses that are most commonly used for open source software the gnu public licensegnu lesser public license and the apache license. Boy, there are so many weasel words in that article it reads like gpl fud to me. The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. This post takes a look at the legal issues raised by both cases and what they mean for foss producers and users. It is thus ensured that mysql will continue to be freely available in the sense of. Gpl requires you to release the source code of your application if you choose to use and distribute the gpl licensed open source software with your application. Aug 30, 2019 in this video i explain the difference between mit, gpl, apache licenses and how to write custom licenses. For example, what is open source, and how does it differ from free software, what is permissive and copyleft. No one open source license is ideal in every circumstance. What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses.
Each has advantages, but the distinctions are sometimes quite subtle. If you use a bsl licensed library, youll need to write your own disclaimer stating that you arent responsible if the software turns into a threeheaded monster and. Gnu general public license, version 3 spdx short identifier. Php 4, php 5 and php 7 are distributed under the php license v3. This is an open source license, certified by the open source initiative. Elle a ete redigee afin deviter des concepts ou des termes, specifiques a certains. Linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration.
Among other restrictions, you must not modify, reverse engineer, or copy the software. What is foss licensesapache, bsd, gpl, lgpl explained. This ticket regarding the boost open source license v1. It is incompatible with the gnu gpl in several ways. Zabbix is free and open source software, however, if you use zabbix in a commercial context we kindly ask you to support development of zabbix by purchasing some level of commercial support. Therefore it is not fair or accurate to credit the gpl as an open source license merely because the open source initiative which started the open source movement. The gnu general public license the gpl hereafter has been selected as the most commonlyused freeopen source software foss license. Jan 23, 2020 the gpl was a trailblazer at the start of the open source revolution and is a prime example of the copyleft or viral license. A federal court has ruled that an opensource license is an. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. Generally, mit recommends either the bsd license or the gplv2 or lgplv2 licenses.
That is, the complete source code of mysql is freely available. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a. Gplv3 of june 29, 2007 contains the basic intent of gplv2 and is an open source license with a strict copyleft what types of licenses are there for open source software, and how do they differ. There are many open source licenses to choose from, some of them being mit, gnu gpl, apache 2. The gpl is no more viral than any commercial license, the only difference is in how you pay to use the software. Apr 07, 2017 gnu lesser general public license it grants fewer right to work than gnu gpl. Jun 29, 2007 by contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users. The primary incompatibility is that this python license is governed by the laws of the state of virginia, in the usa, and the gpl does not permit this. The gnulgpl is very popular among independent developers and companies which mainly deals with open source software.
When users incorporate a component licensed under one of the gpl licenses, they must release its source code, as well. Dual licensing emerged as an open source business model in the early 2000s, and it typically refers to the release of a software component under two licenses simultaneously. Use of gpl licenses increased, but as more corporations begin using open source they chose other licenses where possible which permit them to close the software. Some of the mostinstalled open source software is gpllicensed, such as linux, wordpress, and wikipedias underlying software, mediawiki. Its generally appropriate for libraries and projects that want to allow linking from nongpl and nonopensource. In contrast to lgpl, gpl requires that you provide the code for all changes made to the software. The comparison only c overs software l icenses with a linked article for details, approved by at least one expert group at the fsf, the osi, the debian project or the fedora project. The open software license is a free software license. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and software.
1099 132 781 674 1601 1154 806 512 1155 506 851 920 256 654 474 582 708 747 592 1423 891 1445 76 147 1593 46 1026 947 991 516 1251 1437 1089 504 1081 167 200 1383 345 403